Resume Roast

Provided bySuperpower Resumesuperpowerresume.com

Get brutally honest feedback on the top 5 problems with your resume.

Screenshot of Resume Roast on Superpower Resume
superpowerresume.comOpen the live tool →
About this tool

What Resume Roast does

Resume Roast is a free web tool that analyzes pasted resume text and returns the five most critical issues likely to hinder a job search. The output highlights specific structural or content flaws, such as weak language, missing metrics, formatting problems, or overused buzzwords, giving job seekers a prioritized list of changes to make their document more effective for both human reviewers and applicant tracking systems.

Step by step

How to use the Superpower Resume Resume Roast

  1. 1

    Copy the text from your resume

  2. 2

    Paste the resume text into the tool's input box

  3. 3

    Click the button to roast your resume

  4. 4

    Review the top 5 problems and suggested fixes displayed on screen

Is it right for you

Best for

Job seekers at any career stage who want direct, prioritized feedback on their resume without paying for a professional review service.

Limitations

  • Results are based on text analysis only, not visual layout or design
  • Minimum 50 characters of resume text required to generate feedback
  • Feedback focuses on content issues rather than aesthetic or design improvements
Questions

Resume Roast FAQ

How long does it take to get resume feedback?
The analysis runs instantly in your browser after you paste your resume text and click the roast button.
Is my resume data kept private after I use the tool?
The tool runs 100% in your browser, meaning your resume text is not sent to a server or stored anywhere.
Can I use this tool if my resume is very short or very long?
The analysis checks for both too-short and too-long resumes, flagging length as one of the top five issues if applicable.
What types of resume problems will the tool actually catch?
It checks for weak or passive language, missing metrics, missing required sections, buzzword overload, formatting issues, first-person pronouns, generic statements, cliche objectives, and spelling or grammar errors.